ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
11200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+2300%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
1600
Shading Units
12800
80
TMUs
400
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD102
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
