Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro W600

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +254%
2.72 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
8
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy