Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV516
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy