ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 208W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
RTX A400
+2%
2.706 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
208W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GA107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
