ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R7 360
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 208W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
+63%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
208W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Tobago
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
