ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
P102 100
+307%
10.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1582 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
1600
Shading Units
3200
80
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
208W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GP102
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
