Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +927%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT215
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
69W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy