ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 208W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
+587%
2.64 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
208W
TDP
127W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
R600
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
R600 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
