Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +1820%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net