Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon X1050

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon X1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 151W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
RV410
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
24W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy