Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +369%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
44
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
580W
450 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy