Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD FireStream 9350

ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +68%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
18
800
Shading Units
1440
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Cypress
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy