Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +1735%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
80
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy