Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3570

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3570

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +2800%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3570
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jul 2010
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
2
1280
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.184 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
63.68 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV620
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy