Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +1224%
24.58 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
8192
80
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x SDI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
22 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net