Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +738%
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x SDI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
22 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net