ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs ATI FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
+383%
1.856 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
127W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cayman
GPU Name
R600
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
