Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

ATI FirePro V7800 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +253%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
36
1440
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Polaris 30
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy