Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

ATI FirePro V7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800 +5069%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT218
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy