ATI FirePro V7750 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+365%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
76W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV730
GPU Name
DG1
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
