ATI FirePro V5800 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+115%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
74W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Juniper
GPU Name
DG1
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
Unknown
166 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
