ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (74W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
+8%
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
74W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Juniper
GPU Name
RV770
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
