Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs ATI FireGL V8650

ATI FirePro V5800 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
480 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800 +150%
1.104 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

74W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
R600
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net