ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA T600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
T600
+122%
1.709 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
480
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
TU117
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
