ATI FirePro V4900 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+250%
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
DG2-128
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
