ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (69W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+61%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
800
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
RV770
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
