ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 69W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
A2
+630%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
400
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
GA107
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
Unknown
104 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
