ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+287%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
1440
20
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
Cypress
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
