ATI FirePro V3700 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+3620%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
DG1
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
