ATI FirePro V3700 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+4100%
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
