AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+717%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
4096
Shading Units
12800
256
TMUs
400
64
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
AD102
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.0
Shader Model
6.7
