Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT +66%
13.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2150 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
40
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.62 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.31 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
832.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 22
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Navi 22 KXT (215-127000144)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy