Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 280.3GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (176W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650 XT +35%
10.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2055 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2635 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2190 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
280.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
32
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
168.6 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
337.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.59 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.79 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
674.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 23
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Navi 23 KXT (215-130000136)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
176W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy