AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
+1507%
7.987 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
105W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV670
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.1
