Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +5138%
5.238 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
48
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GF119
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy