AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
+116%
10.97 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
2816
Shading Units
3584
176
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
GP102
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
