AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+1696%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
2816
Shading Units
18176
176
TMUs
568
64
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
AD102
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
