Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

AMD FirePro S9150 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +206%
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net