AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
+406%
5.069 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
800
176
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
RV770
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
