AMD FirePro S9050 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
+35%
3.226 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
DG1
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
