AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+65%
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2880
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GK180
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
