Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +135%
7.603 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
1792
Shading Units
2304
112
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
185W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU106
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net