AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+291%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
1792
Shading Units
4480
112
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
