AMD FirePro S9050 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+509%
19.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-512
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
