Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9010 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

AMD FirePro S9010 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S9010 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9010 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9010
2.867 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +1503%
45.98 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2023
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1287 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
80
1792
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.96 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.98 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1437 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 31
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy