Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV530
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy