Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 53.12GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3850 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000 +653%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
830 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
53.12GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
4
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV670
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy