Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (265W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +567%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro Server
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
80
1792
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Navi 21
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

265W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy