AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 265W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
+229%
3.297 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Server
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
265W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tonga
GPU Name
RV770
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
