AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 265W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
+22%
3.297 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2016
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro Server
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
265W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tonga
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
